Dear Taxpayer, ANIL KAUSHAL (BOSPKXXXXL)
It is observed that you have claimed deduction under section 80GGC of Rs 500000 in your ITR for A.Y. 2023-24. It is requested that the claim may be verified and mistake, if any, may be rectified by updating the ITR for A.Y. 2023-24 by 31.03.2025.

Warm regards
Income Tax Department

Did you received the above message from income tax department? worried about , what should do?

Steps to Take Upon Receiving a SMS for Section 80GGC Deduction Discrepancy or verification

If you have received a notice from the Income Tax Department regarding a claimed deduction under Section 80GGC, it is crucial to verify and rectify the details to ensure compliance with tax laws. Section 80GGC allows taxpayers to claim deductions for donations made to political parties. However, any discrepancies or unverified claims can lead to legal and financial complications.

As a leading CA Firm in Delhi and Noida, we guide taxpayers through the proper steps to resolve such issues effectively.

Steps to Take After Receiving the Notice

1. Verify the Claimed Deduction

• Check your filed Income Tax Return (ITR) for A.Y. 2023-24 to confirm the amount claimed under Section 80GGC.
• Ensure that the donation was made to a registered political party or electoral trust through a valid payment mode (excluding cash).
• Cross-check the acknowledgment or receipt of the donation from the concerned party.

1. Gather Supporting Documents

• Please make sure you are in possession of Donation receipt or Obtain a donation receipt from the political party or trust.
• Keep a copy of the bank transaction statement as proof of payment.

1. File an Updated ITR (ITR-U) if Required

• If you find any mistake in the claim, file an Updated Return (ITR-U) under Section 139(8A) before 31st March 2025.
• The ITR-U can be filed online through the Income Tax e-Filing Portal.
• Ensure accurate reporting to avoid penalties or further scrutiny.

1. Respond to the Notice Properly (in case if you have received the Tax Notice)

• If your claim is correct, respond to the Income Tax Department with necessary documents.
• Use the Compliance Portal on the Income Tax website to submit your response.
• If required, seek assistance from a professional CA Firm in Delhi and Noida for drafting a response.

• We have already highlighted this matter earlier, emphasizing that the government is actively monitoring and identifying fake deductions claimed through updated ITRs. This issue was recently addressed and published on our website. You can read the full article by clicking here

Why Choose a CA Firm in Delhi and Noida?

Handling tax notices and rectifications requires expertise in income tax laws and compliance. Professional assistance ensures:
✅ Correct tax filing and compliance with regulations.
✅ Proper documentation and legal response to the tax department.
✅ Avoidance of penalties due to incorrect claims.

If you have received a similar notice, contact our expert team at N C Agrawal & Associates, a trusted CA Firm in Delhi and Noida, for hassle-free assistance in resolving tax discrepancies and filing Updated ITR.

During various search & seizure and survey operations conducted by Income Tax Department, it has come to notice that various individuals are claiming incorrect deductions, under sections 80C, 80D, 80E, 80G, 80GGB, 80GGC, in their ITRs, leading to reduction of tax payable to the government.

As many as 90,000 salaried individuals, both from PSUs and the private sector, have withdrawn wrongful tax deductions claims totalling Rs 1,070 crore as of December 31, 2024, government sources said on Thursday.

During various search & seizure and survey operations conducted by Income Tax Department, it has come to notice that various individuals are claiming incorrect deductions, under sections 80C, 80D, 80E, 80G, 80GGB, 80GGC, in their ITRs, leading to reduction of tax payable to the government.

During investigation, it was revealed that such individuals are employees of organisations operating in diverse fields including PSUs, big corporations, MNCs, LLPs, Private Ltd Companies, etc, sources said. Also, most of them who claimed wrongful deductions were working in the same company.

Analysis of the information with the department showed that there is a vast mismatch between total deductions under section 80GGB/80GGC claimed by taxpayers in their ITRs as against the total receipts shown by the donees in their ITRs.

Similarly, deductions claimed under sections 80C, 80E, 80G also appear to be suspicious in nature, sources said. They said, a list of common employers (TDS deductors) has been identified and tax department would be reaching out to as many persons as possible who are suspected to have claimed bogus deductions under section 80E, 80G, 80GGA, 80GGC and other deductions

Further, verification has revealed that certain unscrupulous elements have misguided taxpayers for claim of incorrect deduction/refunds,” a source said. Sources said the department has been conducting outreach programmes with employers to spread awareness about the consequences of claiming incorrect deductions in the ITRs and corrective measures which can be taken by the taxpayers to rectify the errors of omission or commission.

Till 31st December, 2024, approximately 90,000 taxpayers have withdrawn incorrect claim of deductions amounting to Rs 1,070 crore approx in their ITRs and have paid additional taxes,” a source said.

As per the provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961, taxpayers can file updated returns on payment of some additional tax rectifying the errors within two years from the end of the relevant assessment year, for AY 2022-23 to 2024-25. In order to intensify the efforts of the department of promoting voluntary tax compliance and reducing litigation, outreach programme with employers is being launched, sources added. PTI JD CS ANU

Source: https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/india/90k-salaried-individuals-withdraw-rs-1-070-crore-worth-wrongful-tax-deduction-claims-12912663.html

After successful implementation of Phase-1 & Phase-2 now Phase-III regarding Table 12 of GSTR-1 & 1A is being implemented, from return period January 2025. In this phase manual entry of HSN has been replaced by choosing correct HSN from given Drop down. Also, Table-12 has been bifurcated into two tabs namely B2B and B2C, to report these supplies separately. Further, validation regarding values of the supplies and tax amounts involved in the same, have also been introduced for both the tabs of Table-12. However in initial period these validations have been kept in warning mode only, which means failing the validation will not be a blocker for filling of GSTR-1& 1A. To view the detailed advisory please click here

Source: https://www.gst.gov.in/

The upcoming Direct Tax Code (DTC) 2025 in India is designed to replace the existing Income Tax Act of 1961, aiming to modernize, simplify, and enhance the efficiency of the tax system. Key features include:

1. Residency Simplification: The DTC will reduce residency categories from three (Resident and Ordinarily Resident, Resident but Not Ordinarily Resident, and Non-Resident) to two: Resident and Non-Resident.
2. Unified Financial Year Basis: The concepts of Previous Year and Assessment Year will be removed, with the Financial Year becoming the sole reference point for tax purposes.
3. Integration of Capital Gains: Capital gains may be taxed as regular income, which could increase tax rates for some taxpayers.
4. Updated Income Terminology: “Income from Salary” will be renamed as “Employment Income,” and “Income from Other Sources” will become “Income from Residuary Sources,” though the main income categories remain unchanged.
5. Expanded Audit Eligibility: In addition to Chartered Accountants (CA), Company Secretaries (CS) and Cost and Management Accountants (CMA) may also be authorized to conduct tax audits, enhancing accessibility and competition in tax audit services.
6. Streamlined Sections and Schedules: Fewer sections in the tax code aim to simplify compliance and reduce litigation complexity.
7. Revised TDS and TCS Rules: Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and Tax Collected at Source (TCS) will apply more broadly across income types, with lower rates but wider applicability.
8. Reduction in Exemptions: Many existing exemptions and deductions are likely to be phased out, broadening the tax base and simplifying filing processes. The goal is to increase the taxpayer base from about 1% to around 7.5% of the population.
9. Corporate Tax Rate Harmonization: A unified tax rate for domestic and foreign companies aims to encourage foreign investment by creating a level playing field.
10. Lowered Tax Burden for Salaried Employees: Salaried employees may see a reduced tax burden, addressing the long-standing issue of a disproportionate tax load on this group.

The DTC 2025 is anticipated to take effect in the fiscal year 2025-26, signaling a major evolution in India’s tax framework that could impact compliance, competitiveness, and transparency across sectors.

An unexpected issue emerged, in which it was stressed that technicalities made via the Department and not the assessee must not be put forth by the department to defeat the legal rights and entitlements of the assessees.

It was carried out by the Bombay High Court that the related Revenue officials (respondent) could not refuse the advantage of the accrued Input tax credit to the taxpayer (applicant) merely because the specified forms had not been furnished electronically but furnished manually.

Since the GST ITC-02 Form was not available for electronic filing, neither the applicant nor TDN could be held responsible for not submitting Form GST ITC-02 electronically on the department’s common portal, the Court stated.

Consequently, the Division Bench of Justice M.S. Sonak and Justice Jitendra Jain asked the respondents to regard the manually filed forms via the TDS as expeditiously as feasible.

The bench therefore specified that if on the due consideration of manual forms the respondents still discovered that the ITC of Rs 18,30,58,995 was not due or was claimed erroneously of and used by the applicant, they are free to pass a relevant order.

Case Facts

The applicant has the business of providing internet services, entered in the Business Transfer Agreement (BTA) with Tikona Digital Networks (TDN), where TDN business was transferred before the applicant as a present concern. Hence TDN approached the AO jurisdictional notifying them of the non-availability of Form ITC-02 functionality on the department’s common portal.

TDN has the objective to transfer unused credit in its electronic credit ledger on the date of slump sale before the applicant. However as Form ITC-02 was not available till now on the GSTIN portal for filing, TDN can not follow with the electronic filing need of the mentioned form.

The applicant in the second half of the year 2017 claimed the ITC to the tune of Rs 18.30 crores. As the respondents do not incur the available electronic facility to file Form GST ITC-02, the applicant has furnished the form manually.

The applicant has received a notice after 6 years alleging that the applicant has erroneously claimed and used the ITC of Rs 18 crores, as the applicant manually furnished the forms. Therefore the applicant has approached the HC contesting the notice and the demand asked from the Respondent department.

High Court Observations

The Bench remarked that the only claim made in the show cause notice is related to the non-electronic submission of Form GST ITC-02 on the department’s shared portal.

The Bench expressed the view that these allegations would be valid if the Department’s shared portal were operating properly, allowing TDN or the petitioners to submit Form GST ITC-02 electronically through it.

The Bench acknowledged that the TDN or the petitioner was unable to submit Form GST ITC-02 on the department’s shared portal during the applicable period due to functionality problems associated with that portal.

Therefore the Bench noted that after the same has been considered that Form GST ITC-02 was not e-filed on the shared portal of the department as it was not operational to generate and accept the Forms, the issuance of the Show cause notice (SCN) is to practice of excessive jurisdiction under the CGST act and the rules.

The Bench noted that the petitioner only claimed the ITC after the CA’s certificate was submitted, which confirmed that the business transfer from TDN to the Petitioner included specific provisions for transferring liabilities.

Respondents can have processed the forms and wished on the issued of ITC if they had problems with the Form GST ITC-02 or GSTR-3B manual filing, the bench said.

The bench outlines that the respondents on the specious plea can not have avoided processing the manual return that Section 18(3) & Rule 41(1) of the CGST Act and Rules identify only electronic filing and not manual filing.

Similarly, the Bench determined that the Allahabad High Court observed that, at the time when BTA transferred its business along with liabilities to the petitioner, the option to file Form IT-02 was not accessible on the department’s common portal, thus ruling that the petitioner should not be denied the ITC.

Moreover, the Gujarat High Court, Delhi High Court, and Bombay High Court determined under the same conditions that the Department’s failure to recognize and transfer the ITC owed to the petitioner was highly unlawful, the Bench noted.

It was therefore specified that the respondents were bound from duty to take cognizance of the decisions of the Allahabad, Gujarat, and Delhi High Courts in dealing with the almost same problem related to the applicant, the Bench quashed the SCN asking for the ITC and permitted the petition of the taxpayer.

It was specified by the Bench that if the respondent concludes that the Input tax credit (ITC) was claimed erroneously. Then the respondents can take action by complying with natural justice.

Probing into a fake Pune based company registered in the name of an auto rickshaw driver, officials of the Directorate of GST Intelligence (DGGI) have unearthed a major fake GST firm scam to the tune of Rs 5,000 crores to Rs 8,000 crores.

Rushi Prakash (39), an officer at DGGI, Pune Zonal Unit, lodged the FIR in this case at the Koregaon Park police station in Pune city on Friday.

The prime accused Ashrafbhai Ibrahimbhai Kalavadiya (50), resident of Surat, Gujarat, is alleged to have opened as many as 246 fake GST firms, using which he committed the multi-crore fraud.

Along with Kalvadiya, police have also booked Nitin Barge, Faizal Mevalal, Nizamuddin Khan, Amit Tejbahadur Singh of Ulhas Nagar, Rahul Baraiyya, Kaushik Makwana, Jitendra Gohel and others in this case, under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 120 (b), 34 and sections of the Information Technology Act, the FIR stated.

As per police records, in October 2023, the DGGI team came across suspicious transactions of online accounts of ‘Pathan Enterprises’ located at Girni Shewalwadi on Pune Solapur highway in Pune.

During investigation, DGGI found that Pathan Enterprises did not exist at this spot, or anywhere else. However, it was registered in the name of Pathan Shabbir Khan Anwar Khan, a resident of Bhavnagar in Gujarat. When the DGGI team found Khan, he turned out to be an auto rickshaw driver, who was completely unaware of the company registered in his name.

Further probe revealed that multiple fake GST firms were registered with a particular mobile number and an email address of Pathan Enterprises Company. While checking the suspicious records, the investigation team came across an ICICI bank account in Rajkot, Gujarat, registered in the name of one Jeet Kukadiya. However, when GST officials checked with Kukadiya, he was found to be working as a private security guard and had opened this bank account for accused Kaushik Makwana and Jitendra Gohel. Kukadiya himself never made any financial transactions from this bank account.

Based on leads obtained during further investigation, the DGGI teams carried out raids in Pune, Mumbai, Rajkot and Bhavnagar cities.

A probe revealed that the accused Kalvadiya was operating Pathan Enterprises and several other fake firms.

Subsequently, he was arrested from a hotel in Mira Bhayandar in Mumbai on March 12, 2024. As many as 21 cell phones, two laptops, 11 sim cards, bank debit cards in the name of different persons, cheque books and rubber stamps in the name of different companies were seized from his possession during searches.

A probe revealed that he had allegedly used the seized material for forming fake GST firms and fraudulent GST and bank transactions. A probe also revealed that Kalavadiya was “buying” fake GST firms, bank accounts and sim cards to generate fake GST bills. But he never did any real business of any products and never paid any goods and services tax to the government.

DGGI sleuths arrested him under sections of the Goods and Services Tax Act. He was produced before a court in Pune on March 13, 2024, and is currently under judicial custody in Yerwada jail.

Meanwhile, further probe revealed that the accused Nitin Barge of Mumbai was allegedly looking after all bank accounts and fake GST bills of fake firms operated by Kalavadiya. Mevalal allegedly handled the cash transactions for Kalavadiya.

The accused Nizamuddin Khan, also from Mumbai, was allegedly providing him the sim cards and bank accounts opened fraudulently using KYC documents of common people. Amit Singh allegedly assisted Kalavadiya in opening fake GST firms. Rahul Bariyya was allegedly selling fake GST firms and bank accounts to people, the FIR mentions.

The probe so far revealed that Kalavadiya has opened 246 fake GST firms including Pathan Enterprises. As per the FIT, he allegedly committed a fraud of Rs 20.75 crores through Pathan Enterprises and cheated the government to the tune of Rs 5,000 crores to Rs 8000 crores through all 246 fake GST firms by evading tax between September 2018 and March 2024.

The Delhi High Court has held that the power to issue notice for scrutiny assessment under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not restricted to the Assessing Officer or the officers of National Faceless Assessment Centre (NaFAC) alone.

As per the statute, a notice for scrutiny assessment under Section 143(2) of the Act can be issued by the “Assessing Officer or the prescribed income-tax authority, as the case may be”

In the case at hand, notice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation).

Petitioner assailed this notice on the ground of having been issued without jurisdiction. It submitted that the expression “as the case may be” indicates that in case, where the jurisdiction is vested within the Assessing Officer, that officer alone can issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Act.

It was argued that in such cases, it would not be open for the “prescribed income-tax authority” to issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act.

Disagreeing, a division bench of Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Swarana Kanta Sharma held, “A plain reading of Section 143(2) of the Act clearly indicates that either of the two authorities – either the “Assessing Officer” or “the prescribed income-tax authority” – can issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act. The expression “as the case may be” also indicates the same.”

Revenue also pointed to notifications issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes in exercise of powers under Rule 12E of the Income-Tax Rules, 1962, authorizing the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), to act as the “prescribed income-tax authority” under Section 143(2) of the Act.

The High Court also rejected the contention that other than the Assessing Officer, only the authorized Income Tax Officers of the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NaFAC) can issue a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act.

It held, “This proposition is not supported by the plain language of Section 143(2) of the Act or Rule 12E of the Rules. Rule 12E of the Rules does not confine the power of the CBDT to authorise only the Income Tax Officers of the NaFAC as the prescribed authority for the purposes of Section 142(1) of the Act.”

Accordingly, the petition was dismissed.

When purchasing property from a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) seller, the buyer is required to deduct Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on the sale amount. The TDS rate and procedures are different compared to transactions involving resident sellers. Here’s a breakdown of the process:

1. TDS Rate for NRI Seller

• Standard Rate: TDS is typically deducted at a rate of 20% plus applicable surcharge and cess on the total sale consideration if the property is classified as a long-term capital asset (held for more than 2 years).
• Short-Term Capital Gains: If the property is held for less than 2 years, the TDS rate is 30% plus applicable surcharge and cess.
• Important Note: These rates are subject to change as per the Finance Act. Ensure you verify the latest rates.

2. Procedure for Deducting TDS

• Obtain TAN: The buyer must obtain a Tax Deduction and Collection Account Number (TAN) before deducting TDS.
• Deduction of TDS: TDS should be deducted at the time of making the payment to the NRI seller, whether in advance or in installments.
• Deposit of TDS: The deducted TDS should be deposited to the government account using Form 26QB within 30 days from the end of the month in which TDS was deducted.
• Issue of TDS Certificate: The buyer must issue Form 16A (TDS Certificate) to the NRI seller within 15 days from the due date of furnishing the challan-cum-statement in Form 26QB.

3. Lower TDS Certificate Process

An NRI seller may apply for a lower or nil deduction certificate under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act if the actual tax liability is expected to be lower than the standard TDS rate.

• Application by NRI Seller: The NRI seller can apply for a lower TDS certificate from the jurisdictional Assessing Officer in India. The application is made using Form 13.
• Processing Time: The issuance of a lower TDS certificate can take a few weeks to a few months, depending on the assessment and verification process.
• Issuance of Certificate: Once approved, the Assessing Officer issues the lower or nil TDS certificate specifying the reduced rate of TDS.
• Furnishing to Buyer: The NRI seller must furnish this certificate to the buyer, who will then deduct TDS at the rate mentioned in the certificate instead of the standard rate.

4. Filing of TDS Return

• The buyer needs to file TDS returns on Form 27Q quarterly.
• The return should include details of the NRI seller, the property transaction, the amount paid, and the TDS deducted.

5. Non-Compliance Penalties

• Failure to deduct or deposit TDS may result in interest and penalties. The buyer may also be deemed an “assessee in default,” making them liable to pay the TDS amount along with interest.

6. Things to Keep in Mind

• Consultation: It is advisable to consult a tax professional or legal expert to ensure compliance with the regulations.
• Documentation: Ensure proper documentation, including the NRI status of the seller, property details, and any certificates related to TDS.
• Payment Consideration: TDS is deducted on the entire sale consideration, not just the capital gain portion.

This process ensures that the transaction is compliant with Indian tax laws, and both the buyer and seller avoid any future complications.

Paying rent to a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) involves specific tax deduction requirements under Indian tax laws. This article details the TDS obligations on rent payments to NRIs and explains the process for obtaining a lower TDS deduction certificate.

TDS on Rent Payment to NRIs

Deductor:
Any individual paying rent to an NRI must deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Deductee:
Tax must be deducted if the recipient is an NRI and the rental income is chargeable to tax in India, irrespective of any Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the country of residence of the NRI. Since the property is located in India, the rental income is taxable in India.

Rate of TDS:

1. Standard Rate: As per the Finance Act 2022, the standard rate is 30% plus applicable Surcharge and Health & Education Cess, amounting to 31.20%.
2. DTAA Rate: If a DTAA is in force, tax should be deducted at the rate specified in the Finance Act or the DTAA, whichever is more beneficial to the assessee.

Time of Deduction:
TDS must be deducted at the time of payment or credit of income, whichever is earlier. This rule applies even if the amount is credited to a ‘Suspense Account.’

Deposit of Tax Deducted at Source:
TDS is required to be deposited to the credit of the central government through Challan ITNS 281 within 7 days from the end of the month in which the tax was deducted. For deductions made in March, the deposit deadline is 30th April of the relevant assessment year.

Statement for Tax Deducted at Source:
The deductor must file a quarterly statement of tax deducted at source in Form 27Q by the due dates specified under Rule 31A.

Certificate of TDS:
The deductor shall issue a certificate of tax deducted at source in Form 16A within 15 days from the due date of furnishing the statement of tax deducted at source under Rule 31.

How to Obtain a Lower TDS Deduction Certificate

In some cases, the NRI landlord may be eligible for a lower TDS rate than the standard 31.20%. To avail of this benefit, the NRI must obtain a certificate for lower TDS deduction from the Income Tax Department.

Steps to Obtain a Lower TDS Deduction Certificate:

1. Application Form:

• The NRI must file an application in Form 13 to the Assessing Officer (International Taxation) under whose jurisdiction their case falls. The form should include details such as the name and address of the applicant, PAN, status (resident/non-resident), and nature and amount of income.

1. Supporting Documents:

• The NRI must submit supporting documents along with the application form, including:
  • Proof of income (such as rental agreements)
  • Computation of income
  • Past tax returns (if applicable)
  • Details of investments or other deductions claimed

1. Submission:

• The completed application form, along with the supporting documents, must be submitted to the Assessing Officer. This can be done online through the Income Tax Department’s website or physically at the respective office.

1. Assessment:

• The Assessing Officer will review the application and documents to determine the appropriate TDS rate. If the officer is satisfied with the evidence provided, a certificate specifying the lower TDS rate will be issued.

1. Issuance of Certificate:

• Upon approval, the Assessing Officer will issue a certificate under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, specifying the lower TDS rate applicable to the NRI. This certificate must be presented to the tenant (deductor) to apply the reduced TDS rate on future rent payments.

1. Validity:

• The lower TDS deduction certificate is usually valid for the financial year in which it is issued. The NRI may need to reapply for subsequent years if they continue to qualify for the reduced rate.

Example:

Ms. Singh, an NRI, receives ₹50,000 per month as rent from her property in India. The standard TDS rate applicable is 31.20%, amounting to ₹15,600 per month. Ms. Singh applies for a lower TDS deduction certificate, providing necessary documents to the Assessing Officer. Upon review, the officer issues a certificate allowing a reduced TDS rate of 20%. The tenant must then deduct TDS at 20% instead of 31.20%, reducing the monthly TDS to ₹10,000.

Conclusion

Understanding the TDS obligations and the process for obtaining a lower TDS deduction certificate is crucial for NRIs receiving rental income from properties in India. Compliance with the stipulated rates, timely deductions, and proper documentation ensures smooth transactions and avoids penalties.

The above article has been written by CA Neeraj Bansal and he can be reach out at +91-971804655.

In India, the Income Tax Act governs the taxation of individuals based on their income, providing two distinct tax regimes: the Old Tax Regime and the New Tax Regime. Each regime offers unique advantages and considerations, impacting how taxpayers calculate their taxable income and their overall tax liability. This article explores the differences between the Old Tax Regime and New Tax Regime for the financial year 2023-24, emphasizing their tax structures, benefits, and the specific advantage provided by Section 87A.

Understanding the Old Tax Regime

The Old Tax Regime, also known as the existing tax structure, has been in place for many years. It allows taxpayers to avail various deductions and exemptions under different sections of the Income Tax Act. These deductions are crucial as they reduce the taxable income, thereby lowering the overall tax liability. Key deductions available under the Old Tax Regime include:

• Section 80C: Deductions for investments in instruments such as Employee Provident Fund (EPF), Public Provident Fund (PPF), Life Insurance Premiums, Equity Linked Savings Scheme (ELSS), etc., up to ₹1.5 lakh per annum.
• Section 80D: Deductions for health insurance premiums paid for self, family, and parents, up to specified limits.
• Section 24: Deductions for interest paid on housing loans, up to specified limits.
• HRA (House Rent Allowance): Exemption available for rent paid if HRA forms part of salary.

These deductions significantly impact the taxable income, allowing taxpayers to potentially reduce their tax outgo substantially. The tax rates under the Old Tax Regime for individuals below 60 years for FY 2023-24 are structured as follows:

Senior citizens (60 years and above but below 80 years) and super senior citizens (80 years and above) have different slabs and rates tailored to their age brackets.

Introduction of the New Tax Regime

The New Tax Regime was introduced from FY 2020-21 onwards to simplify the tax structure by eliminating most deductions and exemptions. This regime offers a lower number of tax slabs but with slightly different rates compared to the Old Tax Regime. The idea behind the New Tax Regime is to provide a straightforward tax calculation process without the need for detailed tax planning around deductions. The tax rates under the New Tax Regime for FY 2023-24 are structured as follows:

Key Differences Between the Old Tax Regime and New Tax Regime

1. Tax Structure:

• Old Tax Regime: Offers multiple tax slabs with higher rates applicable to higher income brackets. Taxpayers can reduce their taxable income significantly by availing deductions under various sections like 80C, 80D, etc.
• New Tax Regime: Provides a simpler tax structure with fewer slabs but slightly different rates. The regime does not allow most deductions and exemptions, aiming for a more straightforward tax calculation process.

2. Deductions and Exemptions:

• Old Tax Regime: Allows taxpayers to claim deductions under sections such as 80C, 80D, 24, etc., which reduce taxable income and subsequently reduce the tax liability.
• New Tax Regime: Does not allow most deductions and exemptions except those specified by the government. Tax calculation is based on gross income without adjustments for deductions.

3. Impact on Tax Liability:

• Old Tax Regime: Often results in a lower tax liability for taxpayers who can utilize deductions effectively to reduce their taxable income.
• New Tax Regime: May lead to higher tax liability compared to the Old Tax Regime, especially for those who would otherwise benefit from deductions under the old structure.

4. Section 87A Benefit:

Under both the Old and New Tax Regimes, individuals with total income up to ₹5,00,000 are eligible for a rebate under Section 87A. This rebate directly reduces the tax liability after calculating taxes:

• Rebate Amount: The rebate is the lower of 100% of the income tax liability or ₹12,500.
• Applicability: The rebate is available to resident individuals (below 60 years) whose total income does not exceed ₹5,00,000. It effectively reduces the tax burden for eligible taxpayers, making the regime more favorable, especially for lower income groups.

Example Scenario: Impact of Section 87A Benefit

Let’s consider an example where an individual’s total income after deductions under the Old Tax Regime is ₹4,80,000:

• Tax Calculation without Rebate:
• Income up to ₹2,50,000: Nil tax
• Income from ₹2,50,001 to ₹4,80,000: Tax at 5% on ₹2,30,000 (₹4,80,000 – ₹2,50,000) = ₹11,500
• Total Tax Liability = ₹11,500
• Tax Calculation with Section 87A Rebate:
• After applying the rebate of ₹11,500 (lower of 100% of tax liability or ₹12,500), the tax payable is reduced to Nil.

Conclusion

Understanding the differences between the Old Tax Regime and New Tax Regime for FY 2023-24, including the benefit of Section 87A, is crucial for taxpayers to make informed decisions about their tax planning strategies. Each regime offers unique benefits and considerations, catering to different taxpayer profiles and financial situations. Whether to opt for the Old Tax Regime with its deductions and exemptions or the New Tax Regime for its simplicity and fixed tax structure depends on individual circumstances and tax planning goals. By evaluating these factors carefully, taxpayers can optimize their tax liabilities while ensuring compliance with tax laws effectively. The inclusion of Section 87A ensures that eligible taxpayers receive additional relief, further influencing tax planning decisions.